Winners and Losers
A quick warning, this post will be political, but I welcome any
comments that engage with any of the thoughts and opinions expressed in this
post in a productive manner.
Over the course of the last 9 months I have come to believe
that the political environment of this country is creating an environment where
we see our political leaders as either “winners or losers” rather than focusing
on engaging in rational debate and discussion on the future of the country.
This has created a “win at all cost” attitude that has increased the divide
between the various portions of the American melting pot. When leaders tweet
about “losers” or question the legitimacy of duly elected officials, they only
increase the divisiveness plaguing our country.
What has kind of surprised me, is how many folks are
reacting to the situation. There has been a lot of focus in my social media
feeds about how “hopeless” and “depressed” people feel about the future of our
nation and how they can’t see a way forward. I would like to offer some
thoughts on that.
1)
If you feel depressed about the ability of your
leaders to inspire you, I would encourage you to look for leadership elsewhere.
Leadership is not a positional thing. True leadership occurs despite the title
or authority of the leader. That is one of the great things about a democracy.
Leaders can come from anywhere and inspire and motivate us and if they are
successful leaders, we can vote them into positions of power.
2)
Find an issue you can deeply about and work in
an passionate, focused, positive way to create that change. You may succeed, or
you may fail, but the benefit you get for following a passion to create change
will be rewarding no matter the result.
3)
Tune out the negativity that seems to surround
us and tell us how bad things are. More than 3 billion people (about half the
world’s population) live on incomes of less than $1,000 a year. Even the “rich”
people in some of these places live lives without access to clean water, consistent
electric power, sufficient sanitation, a stable food supply, and access to
healthcare. If you are reading this post, it is very likely you are
significantly better off than any of these folks.
4)
Take back our political system. Show that
coherent discussion of real issues can take place without name calling,
disrespectful language, and shouted sound bites.
In order to kick off number 4, I
offer my personal political views on various issues. I look forward to engaging
one or more of you (come on - do I really think that more than one person has
read this far?) on one or more of these issues, or even the issue of your
choice.
Let’s raise the level of discourse
and create a 21st century America that is positioned to continue to
set the standard for political stability and citizen engagement.
·
I believe that abortion would become a non-issue
if congress simply defined when life began. Prior to that point, the collection
of cells has no rights, after that it has rights. I personally believe that
occurs around the 10-12 week of pregnancy.
·
I believe that guns, like other weapons, should
be legal. However, I believe that responsible gun ownership requires that you
take responsibility for how your weapon is used. Therefore, I believe we should
hold gun owners accountable for how their weapons are used.
·
I believe that any two adults should be allowed
to commit their lives and futures to each other in an institution we call
marriage. I also believe that private organizations should be allowed to
decline to participate in the ceremonies if the behavior of the individuals
does not align with their core values.
·
I believe that the problem with healthcare is enshrined
in the current “insurance model.” Insurance is normally set up to limit
liability for rare, unexpected events, not to supplement normal preventive
maintenance. Healthcare needs a commitment to decrease the cost for maintenance
and to increase the “supply,” not to supplement the antiquated insurance model.
·
I believe that the federal government is no
better or worse than any other large institution (think large corporations or
big religion). Therefore, they should relegate themselves to tasks that require
large coordinated efforts (national defense, large infrastructure projects,
defining minimum safety standards, foreign policy). If you want responsible,
agile government it is hard for me to believe that this can occur at a national
level.
·
I believe that the primary job of our police
force is public safety, including the safety of suspected criminals. Deadly
force should only be used in cases where lives are directly threatened. I also
believe that communities have a responsibility to help police with this task by
not protecting those that are engaged in criminal activity.
·
I believe that we should allow anyone that
commits to our core values (life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness) to be
admitted into our country and allowed a chance to prove themselves. Geography
of your birth does not determine your commitment to these values. How you live
your life determines these values.
As I said above, happy to engage
in a conversation about any or all of these statements. All I ask, is you be
thoughtful and respectful in your response.

No comments:
Post a Comment